2 ms·
> You disagree, and therefore you are wrong. Hehe and then you wonder why the argument is not going anywhere. If you would be talking about hard science which
by Erlich_Bachman 7y ago
> You disagree, and therefore you are wrong.
Hehe and then you wonder why the argument is not going anywhere. If you would be talking about hard science which is proven by experiments or strong mathematical models, then yes, opinion would be irrelevant. But you are not talking about that at all, you are talking about your own subjective thoughts about the subject. And I just dont think they describe the current nor future state of AI properly.
- crimsonalucard 7y agoIf you read my post... I'm not talking about my subjective thoughts at all. I'm comparing ML to the broader spectrum of engineering and science. I'm illustrating a difference in dichotomy between "training" and "programming". While you are trying to set some kind of bar for "design." Also please don't use "Hehe" here it's against the rules.
- crimsonalucard 7y agotypo "design" -> "understanding"