Given MS history, EEE was the first thing I thought about too. Take something, extend, then claim it's superior and everyone should stop using the original. Bu

Given MS history, EEE was the first thing I thought about too. Take something, extend, then claim it's superior and everyone should stop using the original. But if it simply means they are making a new language using lessons from Rust - then why not. Though I didn't quite get what problem they found with using the idea of scope based lifetimes per object, that they needed to redefine it in context of groups.