No, it's not. Harry Shum admitted this morning that the behavior was due to using users' clickstream as a signal. http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/se

No, it's not. Harry Shum admitted this morning that the behavior was due to using users' clickstream as a signal. http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/search/archive/2011/02/01/thoughts-on-search-quality.aspx http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/search/archive/20... Here's where Bing is wrong: Bing should not be using clickstream data from Google searches as a signal. The core offering of Google search is getting used by its competitor, without any citation. That's wrong. If you were to take the core asset you're supposed to produce, source code, from another developer and pass it off as your own work, would that be right? Oh, but you didn't know it came from another developer? Doesn't really matter anymore, as you've been called out on it. Admit that you were wrong and fix the situation.