4 ms·
Per another commenter's link in here, [1] shows pretty clearly what kind of person the founder is. I don't think there's much ground to stand on if you want to
by mdorazio 7y ago
Per another commenter's link in here, [1] shows pretty clearly what kind of person the founder is. I don't think there's much ground to stand on if you want to actually argue that the initial product wasn't designed explicitly to enable spamming sales prospects.
[1] https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/11/26/20930374/nathan-latka-podcast-saas-data-top-entrepreneurs https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/11/26/20930374/nathan-latka-...
- troydavis 7y agoThat article is about the founder of the Web site where this article was published, rather than the founders of the company, Outreach.io, that the article is about.
- mdorazio 7y agoAh you're right. Should have read more closely. Here's an interview with the actual founder [1]. Relevant quote on the start of what became the current company: "Then at the end of 2013, we decided to give it one more go and we decided to build a workflow internally that would make our sales reps book 10x more meetings." We can debate if that's a good or a bad idea ethically, but to a lot of people including myself, increasing sales meetings 10x = spamming the hell out of people, regardless of what "workflow" you're using. It's rather like increasing your ad clicks 10x with dark patterns and claiming you're totally helping people. [1] https://tanyaprive.com/manny-medina-outreach-io/ https://tanyaprive.com/manny-medina-outreach-io/