3 ms·
If you're talking about roads and bridges, that's all we need to hear. You're constructing a strawman.
by SamReidHughes 7y ago
If you're talking about roads and bridges, that's all we need to hear. You're constructing a strawman.
- EGreg 7y agoAll the infrastructure including entire cities. Why is it a strawman
- SamReidHughes 7y agoChina's ghost cities were privately developed. Edit: A better example for you would be Singapore, with its history of public housing, which gets privately owned (or 99-year-leased). They also have public roads.
- EGreg 7y agoCan you please back up your assertion with sources? Here is the opposite of what you said: Developers acquire new plots of land from local governments and are mandated to construct something more or less immediately.[10] Developers can't sit idly on vacant land and wait for the surrounding area to develop until it's economically viable.[10] This creates the quick-buck mentality in developers to rapidly build in the new area without the necessary demand for housing.[10] "The cities are product of plan-driven economy that many cities are not expected to be complete or vibrant after 15 years of construction." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under-occupied_developments_in_China https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Under-occupied_developments_in...
- SamReidHughes 7y agoYou literally backed it up for me.
- EGreg 7y agoI backed up pretty much the opposite of what you said. Massive government involvement setting the rules and mandates for developers who take the project.