Check the archive.org link elsewhere in the thread. Seems like it was marketed like a remote admin tool for servers, not a stalking tool. Unless they have a hi

Check the archive.org link elsewhere in the thread. Seems like it was marketed like a remote admin tool for servers, not a stalking tool. Unless they have a history of specifically targeting stalkers with their marketing and/or aiding stalkers or something else I hope the case gets thrown out. Even then I hope the courts take a good look at this case. Note: I'm not very happy about stalkers, but we should stick to the laws and not go after people without a good reason.