2 ms·
Do you propose that the thief is rich or does not benefit from the theft? The poor do little to directly increase revenues, so the cold financial evaluations t
by generalpass 7y ago
Do you propose that the thief is rich or does not benefit from the theft?
The poor do little to directly increase revenues, so the cold financial evaluations that states are too good at will reveal a net benefit to the state.
I did not make an claim that "...everything is about spending more to fed[sic} those already at the bottom..." You are presenting a straw man.
The discussion about the entire U.S., which is an incredibly diverse region inclusive of almost every demographic except those found in the very poorest nations on the planet is not useful in a discussion on a specific region within the U.S., and worse is to compare it with somewhere else in the world and make no attempt to explain why the comparison is valid.
- azinman2 7y agoI don’t understand your argument at all. First, we aren’t talking about the whole US — California is literally in the title of the article. And it’s explicitly calling out SF and the Bay Area for most of the article (Scott Weiner, from SF, is the impetuous). The idea that normalizing car theft is a good thing is indefensible. You’re advocating for harming others, as well as creating a lawless society. To attempt to say this presents a solution is to ignore how we got to this place, recognizing there are plenty of other ways to address these issues. My point about Japan was not that it’s the same as the US, but rather cultural changes affect rates of criminal behavior. It’s one potential avenue that’s ignored in public debate in the US that costs no money but has great baring on our collective future.
- generalpass 7y agoI'm not suggesting anything other than the state may not be interested in serving the poor and more interested in reducing what the state pays out. I did not make a statement about what I would personally prefer the state to do.