3 ms·
>NOT USE VERY FANCY STUFF They said "with minimum fuss". Write every non-trivial functionality yourself from scratch is the opposite of minimum fuss. When you
by dkarras 7y ago
>NOT USE VERY FANCY STUFF
They said "with minimum fuss". Write every non-trivial functionality yourself from scratch is the opposite of minimum fuss.
When you use something fancy, and the devs stop supporting it, worst case is you have to write it from scratch yourself at that point, or hope that an alternative exists.
Your suggestion is acting like they don't exist in the first place and write stuff yourself like fancy stuff disappeared - it is a huge hassle and investment all the same.
- mamcx 7y agoI mean VERY fancy stuff. Things nearly "experimental" or that rely in a huge black box. Like "not chance in hell I could replicate it" instead of "very hard, but doable". I know everything have "but..." somewhere (for example: We rely in operating system and the browser, 2 things too hard to recreate) but the idea is always about minimization. Sometimes you NEED to rely in VERY fancy stuff... but then you are walking on luck...