> I would say the premise that owning something gives you unilateral control over the actions of another person You're conveniently ignoring the part in which

> I would say the premise that owning something gives you unilateral control over the actions of another person You're conveniently ignoring the part in which I'm also paying the other person to do something, after the other person freely agreed to do said thing in exchange for being paid. Would you mind replying to what I'm actually saying?