3 ms·
This has nothing to do with IPv6. Unless I am missing something, it is literally just a result of NAT, which using IPv4 does not guarantee, and which using IPv6
by stouset 7y ago
This has nothing to do with IPv6. Unless I am missing something, it is literally just a result of NAT, which using IPv4 does not guarantee, and which using IPv6 does not need to prevent.
- fulldecent2 7y agoRegarding the blog, yes it has nothing to do with the specification of IPv6. It has to do with the way that everybody (nearly everybody?) uses IPv6. This distinction is already complicated enough that we should just tell everybody that "IPv6 is bad" because it is true enough.