3 ms·

I think the original (down-voted) poster meant that DNS should be decentralized to something more than 13 servers, from which any government can decide to seize

I think the original (down-voted) poster meant that DNS should be decentralized to something more than 13 servers, from which any government can decide to seize a domain. A decentralized DNS system would improve free speech, and it would help with due process when it comes to the involvement of law enforcement.

zamadatix 7y ago
There are 13 well known logical servers (~1000 physical) but they all synchronize the root zone from ICANN just as anybody can https://www.internic.net/zones/root.zone https://www.internic.net/zones/root.zone If it's authentication of authoritative response data you're looking for then that's what https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System_Security_Extensions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System_Security_Ex... is for.
ca98am79 7y ago
you are exactly right and this is the reason that DNS will eventually move to the blockchain. As with money and bitcoin, the internet isn't truly free until this happens