5 ms·
The point is open source. Figma is not open source and their "free" version allows for only 3 products? Please don't suggest trashy SaaS apps in the future.
by z3ncyberpunk 7y ago
The point is open source. Figma is not open source and their "free" version allows for only 3 products? Please don't suggest trashy SaaS apps in the future.
- williamdclt 7y agoBeing closed-source and having a limited free tier does not justify insults ("trashy"). You could have made your point politely, for the person you answer to and the software itself.
- hjek 7y ago> Being closed-source and having a limited free tier does not justify insults ("trashy"). Not per se but given which domain the article is hosted I think the response makes sense.
- z3ncyberpunk 7y agoGiven the person I replied to just comes in "insulting" (by your standards) the OP's article all for not having included their favorite insert-random-webapp-of-the-day, making sure to repeat the apps name so we all see it oud and clear, his comment reads to me more like someone being paid to post about it -_- And secondly, considering again that the app he is pushing so hard completely contradicts the spirit of the original article, I think my rhetoric is just fine, I'm sure they will get over any tender sensibilities. Perhaps if they had suggested another app, such as Krita, which aligns more with the article, sure, but not when he comes in telling off OP for not posting hot garbage SaaS apps as a response to an article on open source like they didn't even bother reading it.