3 ms·
It’s hard to trust the intent behind this Jacobin piece, especially because the article is unclear on what problems it is trying to solve and therefore comes of
by throwawaysea 7y ago
It’s hard to trust the intent behind this Jacobin piece, especially because the article is unclear on what problems it is trying to solve and therefore comes off as purely ideologically motivated. It seems like this is walking exactly the path of past socialist authoritarian regimes, where eventual total public control (AKA party or ideological control) comes into being in the name of empowering the common man and “Democratizing”. But how long before public control starts limiting the freedom of the internet by imposing rules on what’s allowed and not allowed in even more heavy-handed ways? Given that the far left (like Jacobin) have been rallying _against_ free speech and mocking it online with “freeze peach” memes, I am terrified at the possibility of them eventually ceasing control of speech platforms. Mind you, I’m not a big fan of the current state either, with a few companies controlling everything. But we have tools for that - namely anti-trust law. So let’s take incremental steps for change rather than entertaining dangerously radical changes.
- claudiawerner 7y ago>Given that the far left (like Jacobin) have been rallying _against_ free speech and mocking it online with “freeze peach” memes, I am terrified at the possibility of them eventually ceasing control of speech platforms. Two points on this thought: there are a variety of viewpoints on the value of freedom of speech within "the left" - needless to say, opinions range from libertarian to unlibertarian. You shouldn't get your views of leftist philosophy from Internet memes. The second point is that you should consider reading the arguments on freedom of speech, those for and against it. Most people only seem to know of the arguments for it. On that point I'd recommend checking out Susan Brison's work for starters.