5 ms·
I think the point is rather that they are not lawyers. I have no idea how comparatively complex the law is. But that is hardly a justification for having less
by 7952 7y ago
I think the point is rather that they are not lawyers.
I have no idea how comparatively complex the law is. But that is hardly a justification for having less training. The potential for harm is the most important factor. That is why you have highly trained engineers or architects (for example). Because mistakes can destroy lives. I think the same should apply to judgeships