> It'd be wishful thinking if there was no evidence to back up that claim. Sorry but no, this is a hint at best. This not evidence. Everything comes to an end,

> It'd be wishful thinking if there was no evidence to back up that claim. Sorry but no, this is a hint at best. This not evidence. Everything comes to an end, eventually. Regarding the GDP/NRJ ratio: the coupling is somewhat less strong, however we're far from the strong negative coupling that would be necessary for our coming energy landscape. As Jancovici said (in this article or another), we always went from an energy source to a better one ( hunting to agriculture; muscles to wind to coal to oil); we never experienced going back to less concentrated ones.