Here's an example of exactly how this subject should be handled. In fact, he even explains why he chose to change the title. You should check out: https://blog

Here's an example of exactly how this subject should be handled. In fact, he even explains why he chose to change the title. You should check out: https://blog.reverberate.org/2014/09/what-every-computer-programmer-should.html https://blog.reverberate.org/2014/09/what-every-computer-pro... Then please read some articles along the lines of: http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/When-to-listen-to-inconvenient-criticism http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruc... Then continue, please do, to minimize, deflect, play pedant, and outright ignore any criticism. No, you do not get to insist that the critique meet your haughty high minded standards of evidence and proof. I don't need to prove why I consider your work amateurish. It has been an interesting expose into just why your website is what I consider amateurish junk. It is very unlikely that you're going to be able to learn very much of anything, which explains a lot about how it got that way. I get it. You are a "programmer". You've earned that distinction by "programming" things, not by understanding them. And I find it especially awesome that in your hyper-competence, you deem it necessary to guide the entire community of people who don't understand things to a whole new way of not understanding floating point. Well, no harm done. You're theory is that they couldn't understand it anyway. So if this website's audience is people like you, I suppose it's fine. Just please don't do any programming that involves numbers or correctness.