4 ms·
They may be, but are they prioritizing the safety of their customers above those of other road users? Saftey for the occupants at the expense of other can be us
by daedalus_f 7y ago
They may be, but are they prioritizing the safety of their customers above those of other road users? Saftey for the occupants at the expense of other can be used as a marketing factor - get a Tesla truck to reduce your risk of getting killed by a Tesla truck/other truck driver.
A similar situation occurred with bull bars in the UK. They protected the car they were fitted to at the expense of the person you hit. They were banned after public outcry - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bull-bars/bull-bars https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bull-bars/bull-ba...
- vonmoltke 7y ago> They were banned after public outcry - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bull-bars/bull-ba.. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bull-bars/bull-ba.... Your link explicitly states they are not banned.
- lonelappde 7y agoIt implies that that original ones were unsafe and banned. > However, since 25 May 2007, it has been an offence for bull bars that have not been approved as compliant with those safety standards to be sold.