3 ms·
> That's when I first heard of Drupal, it wasn't visible at all back then despite I was heavily researching CMSes just then. As the old saying goes, "luck is w
by nemo44x 7y ago
> That's when I first heard of Drupal, it wasn't visible at all back then despite I was heavily researching CMSes just then.
As the old saying goes, "luck is when opportunity meets preparedness".
You were prepared for this by evidence of you research into CMS's at the time. This enabled you to see the opportunity Drupal created. You clearly ran with this and your success followed.
How many other people were there that didn't find the type of success you did? They were just as lucky to be at that conference at that time as you. If anything, you were lucky to have had the insight to see the potential an investment in Drupal could make and clearly it went beyond your wildest dreams in terms of financial and professional success. But even then I'd hesitate to call it all luck since you clearly saw that CMS's were becoming an important technology and Drupal in particular must have fused what you knew about CMS's and what could be possible.
- chx 7y ago> How many other people were there that didn't find the type of success you did? They were just as lucky to be at that conference at that time as you. Ha that's right. What I must have seen but failed to put into words is https://dri.es/drupal-sucks-less https://dri.es/drupal-sucks-less: > All content management systems suck, Drupal just happens to suck less. — Boris Mann at DrupalCON Amsterdam, August 2005. Typo3, Tikiwiki, Phpnuke (heaven forbid), XOOPS, even Mambo/Joomla, these were the systems of the day. Drupal ... sucked less and gained a lot more marketshare.