3 ms·
And this is why arguing about “capitalism” is pointless, there’s a bunch of incompatible definitions. You are using a definition closer to Marx’s, while the GP
by larnmar 7y ago
And this is why arguing about “capitalism” is pointless, there’s a bunch of incompatible definitions. You are using a definition closer to Marx’s, while the GP is using a definition closer to Rand’s. (Most people use a fizzier definition than either of these.)
Just let these definitional arguments go, they’re not interesting or valuable.
- tempguy9999 7y agoLet them go and you have no definitional basis on which to argue, and then how can you engage? I can't see any debate can be at all possible like that. As a general principle agree your definitions before you lock horns and you'll start getting somewhere, if no further than agreeing to disagree.