3 ms·
Who pays you guys to say this? https://miro.medium.com/max/888/1*WPnv_6sG9k4oG3S1A09MDA.jpeg https://miro.medium.com/max/888/1*WPnv_6sG9k4oG3S1A09MDA.jpe... C
by nloladze 7y ago
Who pays you guys to say this?
https://miro.medium.com/max/888/1*WPnv_6sG9k4oG3S1A09MDA.jpeg https://miro.medium.com/max/888/1*WPnv_6sG9k4oG3S1A09MDA.jpe...
Cap-theorem. Blockchain allows for far greater partitions not available to any other database model. In terms of consistency, while I disagree with everything many crypto companies are doing, when it comes to consistency, blockchain allows far larger scabability in terms of consistency over a larger partition than traditional corporate servers running Hadoop or Spark. The availability is surprisingly quick as well. If we're talking maximum scale of big data and their operating methodology, we're going to be talking about blockchain and how to partition the the data between different clusters and how to achieve consensus between nodes. Financial data belongs on the blockchain, outside of corporatocracy control and central bank control.
- spookthesunset 7y ago> Who pays you guys to say this? The only set people with a financial incentive to “shill” are bitcoin/cryptocurrency supporters. More Shilling == higher prices == more lambos for those on the top of the pyramid. To think there is some dark force out there shilling for big banks to scare us from adopting a technology that supports a few transactions a second and requires more energy than several small nations combined.... pretty naive.
- nloladze 7y ago>>The only set people with a financial incentive to “shill” are bitcoin/cryptocurrency supporters. More Shilling == higher prices == more lambos for those on the top of the pyramid. Strawman. I won't answer it. >>To think there is some dark force out there shilling for big banks to scare us from adopting a technology that supports a few transactions a second and requires more energy than several small nations combined.... pretty naive. But central banks, bankers, big time capitalists and the federal government would never do anything outside of public interests? https://cointelegraph.com/news/shark-tanks-kevin-oleary-bitcoin-is-garbage-a-useless-currency https://cointelegraph.com/news/shark-tanks-kevin-oleary-bitc... https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-12/jpmorgan-s-ceo-says-he-d-fire-traders-who-bet-on-fraud-bitcoin https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-12/jpmorgan-... https://www.coindesk.com/former-fed-chair-janet-yellen-is-not-a-fan-of-bitcoin https://www.coindesk.com/former-fed-chair-janet-yellen-is-no... https://www.coindesk.com/us-president-donald-trump-says-hes-not-a-fan-of-bitcoin https://www.coindesk.com/us-president-donald-trump-says-hes-... For the record I don't own any cryptocurrency and never will because I don't believe in it's merits like you, but I am not so naive to think that private interests wouldn't collude against a digital asset highly risky to their profitable margins.