4 ms·
Or higher: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#/media/File:US_Wealth_Inequality_-_v2.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_
by temac 7y ago
Or higher:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#/media/File:US_Wealth_Inequality_-_v2.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_Unite...
- redsymbol 7y agoWhat specifically in this graph invalidates a point in the linked article? And which point?
- WilliamEdward 7y agoIt directly invalidates the headline. Rich are getting richer whilst poor remain about the same. Inequality is rising by definition. It also invalidates a 'specific point' about how the top 0.1% are only earning about half of the increase people thought they were between the 70's and 2012, because clearly the graph shows the top 10% is earning MORE than expected, so they ignored the other 9.9% which seems pretty important. In case you desperately wanted a specific point.
- appleiigs 7y agoThe article points out the data/calculations have been re-evaluated with new adjustments and the conclusions are different than before. It's a bit nonsensical to try to refute new conclusions by just pointing to the old conclusions again.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoThe fact that we have progressed in tech doesn’t mean the equality (that is defined as a relative measure on some date) hasn’t become lower.