4 ms·
Yes, that's just this: ||example.org^ @@www.example.org^ > The other is an authoritative nameserver (e.g., nsd). For my own purposes, the resolver is opti
by bscphil 7y ago
Yes, that's just this:
||example.org^
@@www.example.org^
> The other is an authoritative nameserver (e.g., nsd). For my own purposes, the resolver is optional.
True, although I imagine for most people the nameserver part of it is the more optional. DNS ad blocking software tends to be a recursive resolver that returns 0.0.0.0 results for some unwanted domains. Unbound has the ability to do that (for the few domains I'm filtering entirely), and so I've stuck with that.
- 3xblah 7y agoIt is no wonder that uBlock is so popular. Not sure I understand returning 0.0.0.0. What if the user has some other servers listening. I return the address of some server I control that is bound to a local address, e.g., an authoritative nameserver. Compared to the available solutions this is way too much work for "most people", however from a purist perspective a self-managed DNS approach is not under the ultimate control of a browser-authoring, extension/app-approving company/organisation or some third party DNS provider. Whether that even matters is debatable. As long as these easy solutions keep working, there's no incentive to try a different approach.