3 ms·
There was recently a post in HN called "There is too much stuff". It revolved around the massive amount of unnecessary physical goods we need to shift through t
by angarg12 7y ago
There was recently a post in HN called "There is too much stuff". It revolved around the massive amount of unnecessary physical goods we need to shift through to find what we are looking for. I believe the same thing happens with content.
There is way more content out there that I would like to consume than my time allows. Is not rare to make my way through an article or a 1 hour talk and think 'oh well, that was a waste of time'. Or content that has pieces that I do find interesting, but is so padded that makes the whole investment not worth it. Currently I am reading Domain Drive Design, and I didn't find insights that I consider useful after well over a third into the book (500+ pages total).
I do believe that content curation is one of the most promising fields in the near future, and it will involve a mix of human and technological solutions. This might include not only the act of recommending content, but possibly modifying said content for the user (e.g. summaries, highlights, etc.). In comparison, current recommendation systems are a pure joke.
- rhlsthrm 7y agoOff topic, but is Domain Driven Design suddenly coming into vogue? I just heard of it for the first time this week and went into a rabbit hole of research. I see that the books are not new by any means. I've heard and seen it pop up so many times just this week, including from your comment!
- ratww 7y agoIt seems to me that a lot of people are mixing DDD and functional programming concepts, since DDD meshes well with the concept of "functional core imperative shell".
- Jeff_Brown 7y agoI'm aiming for a federated system in which I don't have to read the whole book because I can read the best of the notes that others have taken. Like if Twitter and Wikipedia were one integrated navigable hypergraph.