2 ms·
Well I understood that it was Functional Programming future and Information and Communications Technology people, but it does not help me to grok that comment e
by anonymfus 7y ago
Well I understood that it was Functional Programming future and Information and Communications Technology people, but it does not help me to grok that comment either.
- ggm 7y agoFunctional programming is a religion. Imperative programming is easier but comes with consequences. Peer review evidence is good for strong typing benefits, FP it's just religious fervour. For an atheist, this is a religion I can get behind. At the tail of. Somewhat lazily.