4 ms·
Is this a submarine[1] article? Honestly reads like CIA agitprop regarding UFOs and the like. I mean, he quite literally says in the subtitle: > should remind
by ydb 7y ago
Is this a submarine[1] article? Honestly reads like CIA agitprop regarding UFOs and the like. I mean, he quite literally says in the subtitle:
> should remind us that seeing shouldn't mean believing.
It's clear to anyone who has done research into UFOs that the whole phenomena was a US military psyop (I can provide sources if anybody asks). However, the new stuff coming out from the community may finally reveal the truth: [2][3]
[1] http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html http://paulgraham.com/submarine.html
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEWz4SXfyCQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEWz4SXfyCQ
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eco2s3-0zsQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eco2s3-0zsQ
- ksaj 7y agoPaul's got a point there. Remember for a while they kept telling us that boy skirts were becoming the norm. Other than the occasional and very rare Utilikilt that I saw in one season and never again since, nope, there was no "norm" attributed to boy skirts. But they kept hammering at it for a few years, and even had a few male runway models wearing boy-skirts. You still never see them out in the wild. A lot has to change before you will. This is the other use of the term "social engineering." It doesn't always work. But it is always obvious in hindsight.