>I thought it was tremendously useful, if only to understand what was in the minds of the people who unanimously voted to sell .ORG. That felt more like a smok

>I thought it was tremendously useful, if only to understand what was in the minds of the people who unanimously voted to sell .ORG. That felt more like a smokescreen than a true insight into the process. It's a lot of fluff and empty grandstanding while not really justifying the sale in any coherent way. The way I read it he's basically saying "being a registrar for .org is our biggest activity and one that gives us a steady and stable income but we also want to do other things, so we decided to get rid of that for some short-term gains". If that's truly what was in the mind of the people who voted to sell they need to test the water supply in that building, there was clearly something messing with their reasoning skills. If there's truly a grand master plan that makes sense behind all of that then they should share it. For now the only plan that makes any sense to me involves several thick layers of corruption.