> So if we take Ethos at their word, they should be just as good a steward for .org as the Internet Society has been Sigh.. I'm guessing the author is/was not

> So if we take Ethos at their word, they should be just as good a steward for .org as the Internet Society has been Sigh.. I'm guessing the author is/was not aware of the serious conflict of interest among the decision-makers and private stake holders who passed through the revolving doors of IS, ICANN, PIR, Ethos. Voting with such naivete, especially underestimating the greed of a for-profit organization, is not being a good steward. They've let down the public in this decision.