4 ms·
Linus' use of explicit language was exactly something that should be used as an example. He rarely attacked people, but instead attacked the actions that they d
by laresistance 7y ago
Linus' use of explicit language was exactly something that should be used as an example. He rarely attacked people, but instead attacked the actions that they did or ideas that they had.
- DarkWiiPlayer 7y agoHe's the Gordon Ramsay of the software world. Sometimes it just takes strong language to get a point across: "your code is low quality and you're wasting my time by having me review it". And to be honest, I'd gladly take being insulted over having to waste my time. Strong language doesn't hurt anyone, but you won't ever get that wasted time back. I consider it verbal self-defense.
- Godel_unicode 7y ago"""My flippant attacks in emails have been both unprofessional and uncalled for. Especially at times when I made it personal.""" https://www.businessinsider.com/linus-torvalds-linux-time-away-empathy-2018-9 https://www.businessinsider.com/linus-torvalds-linux-time-aw...
- laresistance 7y agoHe made those remarks after he pretty much was forced to "professionalize" by The Foundation. I do agree however that at no times should criticism of code or work become personal.
- Godel_unicode 7y agoI'm not sure what point you're making here? In hindsight, he views his words as inappropriate. I'm not sure I understand what the temporal distance between the words and the apology has to do with how appropriate they were.