4 ms·
I agree that this is an elegant lens with which to view the world, and I love writing and computers and all that. But I don't think that oral histories are nece
by 205guy 7y ago
I agree that this is an elegant lens with which to view the world, and I love writing and computers and all that. But I don't think that oral histories are necessarily worse in both content and process.
From my understanding, indigenous Australians and Polynesians had rich oral histories and cultures. Also oral culture may be more adaptable than a musty written document that never changes and must be followed. The human experience of living in an oral culture is naturally being lost, but it doesn't mean it was wrong or bad. I find it fascinating to imagine what life was like for them, how they did things differently.
- gdy 7y ago"oral histories are necessarily worse in both content and process" "doesn't mean it was wrong or bad" It is a dead-end, though. While these cultures are interesting from anthropological point of view, I highly doubt you would give up all the benefits of the culture you live in today and join an Polynesean or Australian tribe.