What I said was: > "the supposed RIGHT to have their speech amplified and distributed ... isn't a thing" No such RIGHT exists, period. End of sentence. That r

What I said was: > "the supposed RIGHT to have their speech amplified and distributed ... isn't a thing" No such RIGHT exists, period. End of sentence. That right isn't "a thing". I've never made a comment supporting "de-platforming", or anything of the sort, so I'm not sure where that came from. All I did, was point out the confusion people have regarding their actual rights. Somewhat ironically, your response perfectly illustrates my point. So, thank you.