How is that better than if humanity left earth? If we left, it would take 50,000 years for a 100 ppm drop in CO2 (which is roughly what we need). How is farme

How is that better than if humanity left earth? If we left, it would take 50,000 years for a 100 ppm drop in CO2 (which is roughly what we need). How is farmers doing as you suggest going to accelerate this to a meaningful human scale rather than 50,000 years. It can't. It won't. Because the things you propose will not do a thing about reducing atmospheric CO2 concentration. They won't even stop it. We already understand that if we convert the entire planet to the most optimal (efficient, clean, cheap, etc.) forms of renewable energy sources not only will atmospheric CO2 accumulation not stop, it will continue to rise exponentially. Again, not my opinions. This is super simple science. Not hard to understand at all. Any claim made must explain how it will improve the rate of change a thousand fold. In other words, just making a claim that sounds good does not make it true.