Well, I mentioned many-minds because a couple guys actually do take it seriously, even though most don't. But I think this entry is a little off when they say t

Well, I mentioned many-minds because a couple guys actually do take it seriously, even though most don't. But I think this entry is a little off when they say that many-minds "extends" many-worlds. On the many-minds theory, there's only one world, which is pretty different on the face of it. And since there are an infinite number of minds, if you get an 80-20 likelihood on values of some observable, then 80% of your minds will go to one and 20% to the other, which is very different from how many-worlds approaches splitting on outcomes.