2 ms·
"It should be marked as disputed" That's not how international law works. By all means maps may be tailored to suit the preferences of markets/countries, but m
by nmeofthestate 7y ago
"It should be marked as disputed"
That's not how international law works. By all means maps may be tailored to suit the preferences of markets/countries, but military conquest of a territory doesn't convert it to a "disputed" status. Currently the internationally-recognised borders between Ukraine/Russia are well-defined.
> We - westerners - would all love [the UK invading and annexing Hong Kong] and accept it immediately.
What rot!
- gnode 7y agoBoth Russia and Ukraine claim the territory of Crimea, and it is therefore disputed. > but military conquest of a territory doesn't convert it to a "disputed" status. Many territories are disputed without conflict. If military conquest, occupation and de facto control of a territory doesn't reify a dispute, then nothing does. For examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes