3 ms·
It should be marked as disputed, from both sides, like "agreed to disagree". Think what would happen if the UK took back Hong Kong, or if Hong Kong declared it
by hollander 7y ago
It should be marked as disputed, from both sides, like "agreed to disagree".
Think what would happen if the UK took back Hong Kong, or if Hong Kong declared itself independent. We - westerners - would all love that and accept it immediately. Would we have a problem then with Apple if they showed HK as a separate country?
- pjc50 7y agoYou might want to have a look at Taiwan.
- nmeofthestate 7y ago"It should be marked as disputed" That's not how international law works. By all means maps may be tailored to suit the preferences of markets/countries, but military conquest of a territory doesn't convert it to a "disputed" status. Currently the internationally-recognised borders between Ukraine/Russia are well-defined. > We - westerners - would all love [the UK invading and annexing Hong Kong] and accept it immediately. What rot!
- gnode 7y agoBoth Russia and Ukraine claim the territory of Crimea, and it is therefore disputed. > but military conquest of a territory doesn't convert it to a "disputed" status. Many territories are disputed without conflict. If military conquest, occupation and de facto control of a territory doesn't reify a dispute, then nothing does. For examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes