3 ms·
What's with posting articles from 2006? There are more recent sources with updates, including from FT.com (behind a paywall) and the investigative documentary a
by mmmmax 16y ago
What's with posting articles from 2006? There are more recent sources with updates, including from FT.com (behind a paywall) and the investigative documentary about this which aired last week in Sweden:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=http://svt.se/2.150075/1.2304474/granskningen_av_ikea_ett_brett_samarbetsprojekt http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&u=...
- vampirical 16y agoThis the ft.com article you're referencing? http://const.it/dewall/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2437643c-2985-11e0-bb9b-00144feab49a.html http://const.it/dewall/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2437643c-29... (link bypasses the paywall) I personally prefer the economist article. I read it back in 06 and I've read a few more on the Ikea tax setup since then. It seems to still accurately represent the situation, some numbers might be out of date but the gist is the same. That ft.com article is a bit sparse, seemingly written as an update for people already aware of the issue, and as you say paywalled. Thanks for the additional and up to date info though.