5 ms·
Just wait until they turn all photos public even ones deleted in the past. It is in their terms if they choose.
by wolco 7y ago
Just wait until they turn all photos public even ones deleted in the past.
It is in their terms if they choose.
- dmitriid 7y agoIt was a programming mistake. Only a few accounts were affected. Inadvertently. Only 300 000 users affected. We're committed to privacy as always and in the coming year well take steps to make sure this never happens again. Our estimations were incomplete and a tad off, 270 million accounts affected, possibly more. Our users are at the center of all we do and will do everything in or power to protect their data.
- sodosopa 7y ago“Only 300,000” You’re minimizing exposing information of enough people to populate most of Cincinnati, Ohio (301k)? Casting that as “only 300,000” is sickening.
- bogwog 7y agoPretty sure they were joking
- saagarjha 7y agoKeep reading.
- vineyardmike 7y agoIts only Cincinnati...
- dmitriid 7y agoIt's a joke and also Facebook's press releases almost verbatim :)
- bronson 7y ago> [we] will do everything in or power to protect their data. Cambridge Analytica and other recent events show this statement to be meaningless. Facebook could have done a lot more to protect customer data but chose not to.
- lostlogin 7y agoI’d this a joke lacking /s, or a genuine post?
- mokus 7y agoI had trouble telling from the first sentence or so, but after reading to the end I’m pretty confident it’s a sarcastic take on a (hypothetical?) press release.
- myrakle 7y agoThat's pretty impressive. Only 300 000 users affected & still promising to do better next year!