4 ms·
>my messages about Pernosco, which I think is much more interesting and important, have relatively little exposure It is not very surprising given that it is a
by garaetjjte 7y ago
>my messages about Pernosco, which I think is much more interesting and important, have relatively little exposure
It is not very surprising given that it is a SaaS which doesn't even list pricing on its page.
>I want everyone to know about Pernosco, not just to attract the customers we need for sustainable debugging investment, but so that developers everywhere wake up to the awful state of debugging and rise up to demand an end to it.
This is rather conflicting statement as Pernosco business model seems to be solely targeted at bigcorps paying big money, and not developers promoting Pernosco through using it in own hobby projects. (I don't know if this is actually true, but email-us-to-just-get-a-quote is huge discouragement)
- mepiethree 7y agoIt is also very difficult to reach a usage example or a workflow on their site. There is no demo. I agree that debuggers suck, but I don't see any clear/obvious evidence that Pernosco doesn't suck. I really just have to take their word for it. I don't want to pay an undisclosed amount of money for the opportunity to spend an unknown amount of time to get started with a new tool that may very well suck.
- roca 7y agoThere's a Youtube video right on the landing page: https://pernos.co https://pernos.co That video links to where you can test that session out for yourself: https://pernos.co/debug/e9UFXkGq__8KQB-N6n59lA/index.html https://pernos.co/debug/e9UFXkGq__8KQB-N6n59lA/index.html
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- roca 7y agoIt's true that we aren't opening the gates for people everywhere to use Pernosco for their hobby projects, because we simply don't have the resources to support that. Hopefully that will change.