3 ms·
Doing nothing is an action. Inaction is not what neutrality means. It is not neutral to let foreign powers interfere with elections (in any country, whether it
by delusional 7y ago
Doing nothing is an action. Inaction is not what neutrality means.
It is not neutral to let foreign powers interfere with elections (in any country, whether it be the US in a Russian one or Russia in a US one).
- thu2111 7y agoDoing nothing is an action. No it's not. Doing nothing is the opposite of action. Please don't twist the language like this - if doing nothing is an action then everyone is engaged in action all the time and the entire concept loses all meaning. Inaction is not what neutrality means Not intervening in a situation is practically the definition of neutrality. That's why Switzerland is described as neutral during World War 2 - they had a policy of no action taken.