5 ms·
I use Kind (and Minikube, and a number of other solutions too), but this is kind of my "Kubernetes-the-really-hard-way" fun project. Note that I maintain a par
by geerlingguy 7y ago
I use Kind (and Minikube, and a number of other solutions too), but this is kind of my "Kubernetes-the-really-hard-way" fun project.
Note that I maintain a parallel configuration that runs a multi-node cluster on Vagrant for local development [1] as well as a docker environment built for CI purposes[2] using almost all the same images, with the same Ansible playbooks to configure them all across platforms.
[1] https://github.com/geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-dramble/tree/master/testing/vagrant https://github.com/geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-dramble/tree/mas...
[2] https://github.com/geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-dramble/tree/master/testing/docker https://github.com/geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-dramble/tree/mas...
- raesene9 7y agoyeah I think this approach will have fewer limitations than kind, and also it's fun to try different approaches! BTW I think your ansible book is great, really helped me get to grips with it.
- vlahmot 7y agoThank you for all of your great Ansible work! I leverage a lot of them at work and they have been great! (I’ll be playing around with these!)
- fizixer 7y agoSorry, late to the party. Thanks for sharing. I fully agree with the fun, and the really-hard-way part. However, if we ignore that part for the moment, would you think having an R-Pi cluster handy is worth it for training/sandboxing/testing with the aim of applying the skills in your day job? Are there any advantages to having access to your own R-Pi kubernetes cluster, despite having stuff like Kind and Minikube available online?