5 ms·
Indeed, if you are a security engineer, everything looks like a threat to you. Therefore, a developer's workstation must be protected just as strongly as a crit
by Koshkin 7y ago
Indeed, if you are a security engineer, everything looks like a threat to you. Therefore, a developer's workstation must be protected just as strongly as a critical database server - at the gross expense, of course, of the developer's productivity.
- umvi 7y agoQualcomm is like this. Their developer workstations are ultra locked down. If you so much as plug in a flash drive, alarms will start going off. If you email them a file, any attachments are instantly quarentined. While I was there it was extremely difficult to transfer a log file from one of their workstations to my laptop for analysis during a debug session. It was also extremely difficult getting new builds into the setup since there was no easy way to get the binary file into their workstations.
- xorfish 7y agoI guess you could have used a private nextcloud instance to transfer it.
- arethuza 7y agoI once worked somewhere as a contractor where developers had 3 separate PCs with a KVM switch - with there being separate development, test and production infrastructure. Ironically they had a serious production incident that almost took the entire (large) company out for a day because they were doing load testing in one environment (they had about 10 separate environments) but they had shared email infrastructure between production and the production-1 environment. The application being tested generated zillions of emails using "real" email addresses that clogged up their production environment.
- flir 7y agoMy worst: Developer machines were dumb (but secure) terminals for remote desktop connections to a jump box, where a VNC connection got us to a Linux desktop living on AWS GovCloud where actual development took place. It was a remarkably risk-averse client.
- BlueTemplar 7y agoIsn't threat assessment (risk/mitigation cost) part of their job ?
- blowski 7y agoPrecisely. Some folks over-estimate the security risks and under-estimate the business risks. Typically, the biggest risk to any organisation is going bankrupt, and doing "too much security" can make that more likely.