3 ms·
> Edit: The question really should be why was that segment on fire for the previous years. BLS chart for a longer time scale: Wouldn't the leading order effect
by Majromax 7y ago
> Edit: The question really should be why was that segment on fire for the previous years. BLS chart for a longer time scale:
Wouldn't the leading order effect be the time-lag of the increase in employment for 25-54yo women?
In the year 2000, the employment rate for the 55-64 group matched the 1970 employment rate for the 25-54 group.
- jcims 7y agoYeah it’s like there’s a generation or two of ass-kicking women working their way through the brackets. They started hitting the low one on the 70’s and filtering into the 55-61 bracket in the mid 90's. Maybe they just aged out around the time of the recession.