Wouldn't you think it would be interesting to the analysis that prior to the Great Recession point, the LIUR growth rate for 55-61 segment was notably higher th

Wouldn't you think it would be interesting to the analysis that prior to the Great Recession point, the LIUR growth rate for 55-61 segment was notably higher than any other segment on the chart? And that in the post-recession era the absolute recovery is on par with the rest? At least they provided the raw data to make merging all four sets together quite simple: https://imgur.com/a/Quw4tFg https://imgur.com/a/Quw4tFg Anecdote time...my mom is 68, has a high school education and was able to land five different jobs over the past five years. She's picky, so she ends up quitting them, but after 15 years running the office for a wholesale seed distributor she ran a small store, ran a restaurant, was a picker in a pharmaceutical fulfillment shop, etc etc in a relatively depressed town in Ohio. They were just supplemental income $12-18/hr, but jobs are out there for women in this bracket if they want them. She decided she didn't want them and retired two years ago. Now she farts around the house and agitates my step dad. Edit: The question really should be why was that segment on fire for the previous years. BLS chart for a longer time scale: https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v72n1/v72n1p1-chart01.gif https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v72n1/v72n1p1-chart01.gi...