> Copyright only exists to stop humans from being upset over their work being appropriated. That's not the intention of it. You can read the definition. It's t

> Copyright only exists to stop humans from being upset over their work being appropriated. That's not the intention of it. You can read the definition. It's to incentivize creativity. Otherwise it shouldn't even apply. > The AI, no matter how much you program it to pretend to care, can never be sentient enough to actually care It's more or less what I said as well, i.e. if it's not comparable to human, it shouldn't be applied.