3 ms·
There is no sexism going on here, I would have said the exact same thing if Kim Kardashian was a male. But it's easy to "drown the fish" and accuse people of se
by throw_m239339 7y ago
There is no sexism going on here, I would have said the exact same thing if Kim Kardashian was a male. But it's easy to "drown the fish" and accuse people of sexism to shut down any discussion.
I'm starting to wonder if it's a form of subtle ad hominem and internalized logical fallacy /s
- BoorishBears 7y agoa) "drown the fish" does not mean what you think it does, and if anything means the opposite of what you think it does b) Don't flatter your "discussion", you're claiming a person who: was successful before a sex-tape and had their most well known success already in motion before a sex-tape, I'd venture has had more success after said sex-tape than anyone else who's ever had one... should be known for a sex-tape. There's no positive interpretation of that, I just chose the most common one I've encountered. Maybe you're just an avid enjoyer of her tape and can't see her for more than that?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- throw_m239339 7y ago> a) "drown the fish" does not mean what you think it does, and if anything means the opposite of what you think it does You're right, I should have called you a freaking troll straight out because this is obviously what you are, I was too polite, my bad /s > There's no positive interpretation of that, I just chose the most common one I've encountered. Maybe you're just an avid enjoyer of her tape and can't see her for more than that? No argument whatsoever, resorts to personal attacks, continue suggesting I'm a sexist and I watch pornographic material while you literally keep promoting the career of a pornstar yourself? because that's exactly what it is called. But that's the only thing you can do after all. You're are effectively a troll. Get on with your sad life.