3 ms·

Enthusiast communities are probably not the most objective group of folks, so I'd take what they have to say with a grain of salt.

• mistermann 7y ago
  Of course, but be careful not to make the mistake of assuming that members in those communities are homogeneous. There's certainly no shortage of woo-woo style thinking, but there are also enthusiasts who think about it very seriously and analytically. These same people will also tell you that anything they say should be taken with a grain of salt. These are the people who should be mainly listened to. Regardless, I fail to see any evidence that supports the assertion that you also need therapy, that you cannot benefit substantially without it. Those who have literally no first hand experience with psychedelics are not exactly objective either, but it sure doesn't stop them from confidently passing out advice.
  • diminoten 7y ago
    So if I found any evidence at all, you'd agree you were wrong? Seems pretty strong if a stance to take...
    • mistermann 7y ago
      My emphasis is on the word need. I'd happily consider any evidence you've seen.
      • diminoten 7y ago
        My emphasis is on the word "risk" (captured in the literal words "most likely"). It's risky to go without a guide, though it's not "needed" in the sense of a 100% failure rate. Honestly, the fact that you assumed others were talking about "have a guide or 100% failure" is disingenuous on your part.