3 ms·
I use the railwaycat port of emacs, which is frankly what any macos-based emacs user should use. I provides smooth scrolling, an interface with applescript, tou
by na85 7y ago
I use the railwaycat port of emacs, which is frankly what any macos-based emacs user should use. I provides smooth scrolling, an interface with applescript, touch bar support, and lets you use os-native hotkeys including Command-as-Meta.
- spudlyo 7y agoI agree that the Mitsuharu version of emacs is pretty great on the Mac, but the lack[0] of multi-tty[1] support is a deal breaker for me. I like emacs-plus[2], which while not quite as nice as the railwaycat/mitsuharu version, allows me to run text frames and GUI frames on the same server process. [0]: https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac/pull-requests/2/add-multi-tty-support-to-be-on-par-with/diff https://bitbucket.org/mituharu/emacs-mac/pull-requests/2/add... [1]: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/MultiTTYSupport https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/MultiTTYSupport [2]: https://github.com/d12frosted/homebrew-emacs-plus https://github.com/d12frosted/homebrew-emacs-plus