>especially that people are now looking to psilocybin as a means of treating depression I might be wrong and please correct me if I am, but I'm interpreting yo

>especially that people are now looking to psilocybin as a means of treating depression I might be wrong and please correct me if I am, but I'm interpreting you saying that as a bad thing. If you are saying that as if it's a bad, or perhaps 'crazy' thing, why? Why would turning to a natural compound that shows promise, be any different than a synthetic chemical cocktail that similarly interacts with the brain? Yes I know, natural doesn't eman something is safe or good (I mean, all sorts of things are naturally fatal to humans) but I see this as an actual good thing. What limited exploration with such compounds as a means of treating (or curing) various mental issues looks promising and removing the legal barriers and stigmas associated with these 'drugs' to properly test them seems like a great thing