Because saying that Apple’s Q1 results were “insane” is not actually insane. I won’t defend every single piece but I will defend that particular headline and th

Because saying that Apple’s Q1 results were “insane” is not actually insane. I won’t defend every single piece but I will defend that particular headline and the linked article. I won’t go hunting for pieces I disagree with because I usually don’t read anything by Siegler. He often is a biased hack, you know. But not in this particular piece and not as far as the headline of Siegler’s article on Apple’s Q1 results is concerned. How could saying that Apple’s Q1 results were “insane” ever be considered biased? Just look at those results! They were insane in every way!