3 ms·
When was that? Large sections of the article are about his being anti-Zuck (by name). (In, granted, a PR-happy way - book, tour... but still.)
by majormajor 7y ago
When was that? Large sections of the article are about his being anti-Zuck (by name). (In, granted, a PR-happy way - book, tour... but still.)
- mindgam3 7y agoApril 2019. See link below for context. To your point: being anti-Zuck in public is a transparent ploy for attention if you're not anti-Zuck in private. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/roger-mcnamee-facebook-terrible-america https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/roger-mcnamee-facebook...
- retsibsi 7y agoWhat do you mean by 'in private' here? The criticism in your other comment seems to be based on things that he said at a public or at least semi-public event.
- mindgam3 7y agoIn private meaning directly to Zuck, who he claims is his friend. His stated unwillingness to confront Zuck directly means that his entire public narrative is grandstanding at best.