6 ms·
Copy/pasting this from thingist, but: "We're trying to have a society over here." Imagine this for a moment: You just purchased a new microwave and would like
by blhack 16y ago
Copy/pasting this from thingist, but:
"We're trying to have a society over here."
Imagine this for a moment: You just purchased a new microwave and would like to plug it in on your countertop and cook a delicious burrito, but you can't. Why can't you? Because the power company only allows you enough power to run a small coffee maker, or maybe a rice cooker, or maybe a toaster, but none of these things at the same time.
This is the internet, and it is horrible.
Now imagine that General Electric, who makes the microwave, also owns the power company. They have decided that only GE branded appliances will work properly on their power distribution network. You can have a toaster, but if you have a GE microwave, the toaster will only toast things like 10% (because the GE microwave gets priority, you see), and won't work at all for bagels. Now imagine that Westinghouse, who manufactures your toaster, actually pays GE to transmit the power to your house. Would this make you angry?
This is net neutrality.
Howabout this! You purchase 10,000 gallons of water from your city. The city enjoys selling you these gallons, but they decide that you are only allowed to use them in the shower. If you want to use some of those 10,000 gallons in the dishwasher...wellllll, you're going to have to spend an extra $30/mo for the privilege.
This is AT&T, and this is internet on cellphones.
This is insane, and this is stifling innovation.
ISPs and telcos, we're trying to have a society over here, would you please get with the program?
Why is this nonsense tolerated? In the past we've gotten together as a civilization and realized that certain things are important to our continued development. Schools, for instance, were recognized as important because it's important to have an educated population. The interstate system was recognized as a hugely important economic driving force because it allowed people to quickly move around. The rail system was recognized as important because it meant that we could move goods.
Why haven't we gotten together (well, we have, geeks have) and decided that having un-meterd fiber to every home in the United States is an enormously important piece of our future success as an economy?
How awesome would it be if I could build a (albeit crappy [because I don't have generators and flywheels]) datacenter in my house? I want to build $really_cool_app...so I just do it. This is freaking possible. The incremental cost of transmitting bits is almost nothing. Why aren't we making this happen?
By the way, US lawmakers, other countries are making this happen.
- mayank 16y agoIf we're on analogies, this is like the USPS deciding in the early 2000s that you have to pay to receive mail as well as to send it. eBay and Amazon have just made it big and resulted in a massive increase in package deliveries, so USPS decides to double-dip and get a slice of the Internet pie. Also, the cost of postage does not go down -- their revenues just go up.
- protomyth 16y agoYep, except you have to add FedEx, UPS, etc. won't carry your packages because they don't serve your area.
- _delirium 16y agoThat used to be the case, and was one of the things the USPS used to complain about--- they were legally mandated to deliver to every valid postal address in the U.S., while UPS and FedEx could exclude unprofitable remote areas. It appears both UPS and FedEx now promise delivery to every U.S. address; would be curious to know when that happened. They do, unlike the USPS, levy a surcharge for delivery to areas deemed "remote", though.
- quag 16y agoBefore stamps, there were two options: pay someone to deliver the letter or pay when you receive the letter.
- tertius 16y agoSounds like text messages in the U.S. Very strange when I got here from South Africa.
- rottencupcakes 16y agoImagine this for a moment: You just purchased a new microwave and would like to plug it in on your countertop and cook a delicious burrito, but you can't. Why can't you? Because the power company only allows you enough power to run a small coffee maker, or maybe a rice cooker, or maybe a toaster, but none of these things at the same time. This is the internet, and it is horrible. For this analogy to make sense, we would all have to pay a fixed amount for electricity and then be entitled to consume as we want. Last time I checked, Comcast (and all other ISPs) offer a range of plans for increasing amounts of money with increasing limits and caps. The ISPs pay gigabyte per gigabyte in their peering arrangements (and yes, some gigabytes cost them more than other gigabytes), why can't they pass that cost onto you? And, even looking past that, I for one trust monopolistic telecoms such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon to innovate faster and get better internet into the hands of consumers than the US Government.